Chemistry is a common discipline among the contemporary students. You really cannot succeed without appreciating the fundamental concepts of chemistry. However, it appears to be one of the top courses people hate. This result confuses chemistry students a lot. We like chemistry very much, we find it practical in life, and we try hard to defend its popularity. The first thing to do is to change how people view about the discipline, and this requires teaching them to know chemistry well. So, a notable question arises: Do students in chemistry major have different mindsets from those who are not?
First thing that pops up is the stereotype. Chemistry is just a natural science, but pretty much a physics and biology, chemistry is viewed as supernatural in the general population. Consequently, students who do explicit work on chemistry will be referred as “genius”, and some of my friends do say this word to me. This word, as it looks shiny, creates an unnecessary cognitive barrier for non-chemistry students. These people will be prone to giving up studying chemistry. Once, a friend who is in economics major asked me about problems in general organic chemistry. She was stumbled upon drawing constitutional isomers for hexane, and put much anger in the problem’s worthlessness. As I helped her figuring out this question, she sighed, “Everybody hates organic chemistry, how could you even learn this delightfully?” My answer is quite short for this serious issue. Chemistry is very conventional, and I like to explore those conventions.
Indeed, chemistry is very attractive for us because it simply reveals laws of matters, but the deeper cut stuff is the many baffling glossaries. You have to remember a lot of words before doing things for chemistry, and it costs time. Not to mention about remembering the names for elements and compounds, but many subcategories, such as atomic theory, stoichiometry, electrochemistry, inorganic, organic, all have their own languages. Chemistry students have sensed the difficulty like everyone else, but they rather view it as a chance to prepare for their movements. Nature renders us various substances, and we need to explore their properties and reactions from understanding certain explanations, and chemistry does these things. Chemistry accounts for the fact that when freon evaporates from liquid state, it absorbs much heat from the surroundings. So, it was used as a coolant. However, as scientists found out freon’s damage for the ozone layers, a new call for a environmentally-friendly coolant comes in. For something to be a coolant, it needs, for example, to absorb heat when evaporate, like what freon does. From learning specific examples, we can make generalization about certain principles, and these general rules get into other examples that can have potential benefits for the society.
Anyhow, chemistry students do have different perspectives for chemistry. In contrast to traeating it as a courseload, chemistry students regard chemistry as a toolkit for them to change something. It is true that chemistry requires a distinct methodology of dealing with problems. That methodology, in turn, affects chemistry students’ mode of seeing the world. This world view, when visualized by their actions, can be sheer bizzard occasionally. But if you scan those stuents’ brains, the signal patterns they reveal, and the biomolecular processes inside every neuron, are quite much the same as other people.